Is PostgreSQL ready for mission critical applications?
От | Stephen Birch |
---|---|
Тема | Is PostgreSQL ready for mission critical applications? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3837E9B7.21B7C45C@ironmountainsystems.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Is PostgreSQL ready for mission critical applications?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Question: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission critical applications? ---------------------------------------------------- This has to be a FAQ, but I cannot seem to get a good answer. I have just returned from a very interesting Comdex where I spend a few hours in the Linux area asking for opinions on this issue. Most people were unsure and suggested that MySQL has a great reputation for stability and may be a better choice. Since I want transaction support, MySQL is not an option for me. In fact, I really wanted the DBMS to support referential integrity as well, PostgreSQL doesn't :-( Several people reminded me that MySQL is faster than PostgreSQL. However, performance is far less important to me than the basic question of stability. The database must be stable enough to run almost 24x7 and must never suffer from data corruption or from mysterious crashes. Is anyone out there actually using PostgreSQL for a mission critical application? Is PostgreSQL ready for prime time? Help! PS Many thanks to the MySQL advocate at the KDE stand who provided a compelling argument that my particular application did not need transactions. Further thought convinced me that they are a requirement. Sorry I didn't get your name - yours was an insightful discussion. Also, thanks to Michele Webster at the Applix booth for a lively discussion regarding this issue and for the suggestion that I post the question at the PostgreSQL site.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: