Re: [HACKERS] Re: Postgresql Docs....
От | Evan Simpson |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Postgresql Docs.... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3832EDA3.92AE9AF7@4-am.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Postgresql Docs.... (Peter Eisentraut <e99re41@DoCS.UU.SE>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
One half-decent newspeak alternative I've seen to "free software" and "open source" is "Wide-Open Source" (WOS). It seems designed to imply that your licence is "open source, and then some", such as BSD-style without the advertising clause and meaningless reference to Berkeley. "Aaron J. Seigo" wrote: > > > How about "free software" or "freely available"? As in "free to do > > > whatever you want", not Free(tm) as in FSF. IMHO, "open source" sounds to > > > buzzword-compliant these days. > > > > How about simply "BSD licensed?" > > traditional "BSD Liscences" have that silly advertising > clause.. which postgres does as well, unfortunately... quite honestly, i find > that irritating and antiquated. *shrug* not like the regents are exactly doing > anything important w/postgres now, right? and for all the shouting of "its > TRULY free", there are string attatched... Cheers, Evan @ 4-am
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: