Re: AWL: Re: tm1
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: AWL: Re: tm1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 382BB99C.7B8B94E0@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: AWL: Re: tm1
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> People may have problems with the NULL statements with some versions > of PostgreSQL. I have information about editing the applix macro > on that creates the tables my web site: > http://www.radix.net/~cobrien/applix/applix.txt Just in case someone cares ;) The "NULL" constraint for a column definition is not defined in SQL92, and is not necessary and could be dropped from Applix's definition of the table. The default behavior of any column defined in SQL is to allow NULL values. Postgres does not implement this redundant syntax extension because yacc-style parsers such as the one used in Postgres find the use of the bare NULL an ambiguous context. Presumably that is why SQL92 does not define it. However, I see that in a limited context, such as a bare NULL with no other qualifiers, yacc can handle its use. I'll add it to Postgres' next release... - Thomas -- Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu South Pasadena, California
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: