Re: SQL JSON compliance
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SQL JSON compliance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 380d209e-fea4-0e2d-1820-5ab990f4a660@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | SQL JSON compliance (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: SQL JSON compliance
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 13.04.22 22:43, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Simon has just pointed out to me that as a result of recent commits, a > number of things now should move from the unsupported table to the > supported table in features.sgml. In particular, it looks to me like all > of these should move: This all looks correct to me. Please go ahead. > T811 Basic SQL/JSON constructor functions > T812 SQL/JSON: JSON_OBJECTAGG > T813 SQL/JSON: JSON_ARRAYAGG with ORDER BY > T814 Colon in JSON_OBJECT or JSON_OBJECTAGG > T821 Basic SQL/JSON query operators > T822 SQL/JSON: IS JSON WITH UNIQUE KEYS predicate > T823 SQL/JSON: PASSING clause > T824 JSON_TABLE: specific PLAN clause > T825 SQL/JSON: ON EMPTY and ON ERROR clauses > T826 General value expression in ON ERROR or ON EMPTY clauses > T827 JSON_TABLE: sibling NESTED COLUMNS clauses > T828 JSON_QUERY > T829 JSON_QUERY: array wrapper options > T830 Enforcing unique keys in SQL/JSON constructor functions > T838 JSON_TABLE: PLAN DEFAULT clause
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: