Re: [GENERAL] Postgres INSERTs much slower than MySQL?
От | Vadim Mikheev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Postgres INSERTs much slower than MySQL? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 380D7982.71DEF932@krs.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] ld.so failed ("Carsten Huettl" <CHUETTL@ahorn.sgh.uunet.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] Postgres INSERTs much slower than MySQL?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Lincoln Yeoh wrote: > > It's now a lot faster. Now only about 5 or so times slower. Cool. > > But it wasn't unexpected that I got the following after a while ;). > > NOTICE: BufferAlloc: cannot write block 990 for joblist/central > > NOTICE: BufferAlloc: cannot write block 991 for joblist/central > DBD::Pg::st execute failed: NOTICE: BufferAlloc: cannot write block 991 > for joblist/central > Error executing insert!NOTICE: BufferAlloc: cannot write block 991 for > joblist/central > Database handle destroyed without explicit disconnect. > > I don't mind that. I was actually waiting to see what would happen and > my jaw would have dropped if MVCC could handle Multi Versions with > 10,000,000 records! It doesn't seem as MVCC problem. MVCC uses transaction ids, not tuple ones, and so should work with any number of rows modified by concurrent transaction... In theory... -:)) Vadim
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: