Re: PSQL commands not backwards-compatible
От | Greg Sabino Mullane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PSQL commands not backwards-compatible |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 37ff65fd58f648f1bb7ff9abc42a6a6a@biglumber.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PSQL commands not backwards-compatible (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tom Lane wrote: >>> This isn't a bug, it's a feature request. We've never had backwards >>> compatibility of psql backslash commands. >> In the past, most of these usually worked. > They've been broken on a fairly regular basis in past releases. > Certainly 7.3 broke every single one because of the addition of > schema syntax ... I think that example is the exception, and not the rule. All other versions /except/ 7.3 worked for the most part with older versions. I think this is a worthy goal. We don't have to try and go back to 7.2 or anything, but I think most users would presume that psql would at least work on at least the previous version. If it's the beta timing, I can understand that, but there wasn't all this fuss when I made psql backwards-compatible last time for tablespaces. Also, I would think the no new feature rule could be bent a little here, considering that psql is a relatively small standalone app, and, as pointed out, we are definitely going to see people complain about this on the list. A little bit of effort now will make the project look much better in the long run. - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200508301952 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFDFPHQvJuQZxSWSsgRAgtaAKDbRUWHlrqbtIipJiJjP2TaX9OesQCg2IBe cUDudmot1bIZpWqhtVH/7OA= =E6aE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: