Re: Proposed patch - psql wraps at window width
От | Brendan Jurd |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposed patch - psql wraps at window width |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 37ed240d0804231551g1c9b602sbcb03e1f583af12f@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Proposed patch - psql wraps at window width (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposed patch - psql wraps at window width
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:30 AM, Bruce Momjianwrote: > I have moved this discussion to hackers in hopes of getting more > feedback, and moved the patch to a static URL: > Hi Bruce, This is a very cool feature! Looking through the patch I did have a few thoughts. This is definitely going to introduce merge conflicts with my printTable API patch. That's not a problem, just a "note to self" that when/if this patch goes in I'll have to submit a fresh version of my patch. This psql message seemed a bit strange: + if (!quiet) + printf(_("Target column width for \"wrap\" format is %d.\n"), popt->topt.columns); To me, this message sounds like you're setting the width of a single column, when in fact you're setting the target *total* width of the table. I think this message would be more clear if it read "Target output width ..." or "Target table width ...". Also, as far as the user is concerned the format is referred to as "wrapped", not "wrap". Cheers, BJ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: http://getfiregpg.org iD8DBQFID72J5YBsbHkuyV0RAr45AKDETJTapg6c836Cr1RS8uk3gUUH0ACdH8mQ M8ikE3VO+3H2/rt8AvhVoew= =Jfnk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: