Re: WIP: psql default banner patch
От | Brendan Jurd |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP: psql default banner patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 37ed240d0804221707q3f043c55x7565d637281a7b5f@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP: psql default banner patch ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: WIP: psql default banner patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Why do we care, if the version matches? Not that I am feeling like > fighting about it but it seems just a waste of bytes. It makes sense if > the version doesn't match. > To take a field example, I have one site where I run an 8.2 production cluster, an 8.3 application testing cluster and my a personal 8.4devel cluster for hacking postgres. In such an environment, it's *very* useful to have instant feedback on which server I've just connected to with psql. Cheers, BJ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: http://getfiregpg.org iD8DBQFIDn3R5YBsbHkuyV0RAjQKAKCLlD3OIdk53D9gI8Kr0BI75WsRSwCfRQLB 30F55MfJN0W6Lzo8mba/yvg= =fQzl -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: