Re: Separate psql commands from arguments
От | Brendan Jurd |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Separate psql commands from arguments |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 37ed240d0804041833h655503fk9e54292f79ab5129@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Separate psql commands from arguments (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 12:14 PM, Gregory Stark wrote: > "Brendan Jurd" writes: > > Okay, but what on earth is "\c&" and what would you expect it to do > > when it "works"? I suppose you're connecting to a database, but > > somehow I don't think you're talking about a database with the name > > "&". > > Sorry, it was in a patch I submitted a while ago to do concurrent connections. > It's supposed to be like & in the shell -- which doesn't require a space > before it. I was just explaining in a parenthetical comment the only reason I > was personally fond of that feature. It's not an important factor. > Ah, thanks for clearing that up. I wasn't tuned into the concurrent connections thread. I agree that having shell-like behaviours is a useful goal. The good news is, if we had a psql where the command and the arguments are always separated, we could just make \c& a separate command from \c. Cheers, BJ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: http://getfiregpg.org iD8DBQFH9tbk5YBsbHkuyV0RAuohAKDYa6/hTEqVQr5nYlsZLLu14NuwzwCeOmVF 854P3drq/8+SrMwcbhUFNw4= =PjSp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: