Re: [INTERFACES] problems with large-objects
От | Wolfgang Hottgenroth |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [INTERFACES] problems with large-objects |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 37F62682.D3A869EA@kja-essen.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [INTERFACES] problems with large-objects (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
Hi Tom, thank you for that fast answer. So I failed when reading the manual, because I never realized, that using transactions are a requirement when working with LO's. Wolfgang Tom Lane wrote: > > Wolfgang Hottgenroth <wn@kja-essen.de> writes: > > Sometimes ago I want to switch from 6.4.2 to 6.5.1 and my tools, using > > the large objects through the perl-library refused to work. lo_import > > didn't work anymore. > > 6.5.* only allows large objects to be kept open within a single > transaction; you have to wrap BEGIN...END around anything that involves > lo_open ... lo_read/write ... lo_close. In particular, since lo_import > and lo_export are just such sequences, they need to be called inside > a transaction. > > This restriction has been documented as required all along, but older > Postgres releases didn't enforce it (they'd just fail once in a while > if you didn't do it :-(). > > It'd be nice if lo_import could start/finish a transaction for itself, > but I don't see any good way to do that without breaking things for > the case that you want to do several lo_imports in one transaction. > > regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: