Re: [HACKERS] Operator definitions
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Operator definitions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 37EA2C02.C0759C88@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Operator definitions (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Operator definitions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > It looks to me like '^' and '|' have been left out of the alternatives > > for MathOp in src/backend/parser/gram.y. It could be they were > > deliberately omitted, but I bet it's just an oversight. > OK, here is a patch to allow both ^ and | as operators, both in operator > definitions and expressions. It seems to work for me. Unfortunately the > regression tests do not tell me an awful lot, as several of them fail on > the Alpha anyway. As I don;t really know what I'm doing, I'd appreciate > it if somebody else could check the patch out and let me know whether it > is ok. It's fine as far as it goes, but istm that there are other cases missing from gram.y also :( Bruce, how did this stuff get into the stable release? Looks like we are going to need a v6.5.3 Real Soon Now. And packagers, we should plan on having a patch for v6.5.2. I'll try coming up with one in the next couple of days; I've tested on my own gram.y but it has too many other changes to be used as-is. - Thomas -- Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu South Pasadena, California
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: