Re: [HACKERS] Compile timing
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Compile timing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 37E9BCEF.57C8F6A8@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Compile timing (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Compile timing
Re: [HACKERS] Compile timing |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Not sure why -j2 is not faster than normal -j... I was just looking at this a little while ago at work. It is not faster because gmake does not propagate the "-j2" flag to submakes, on the (correct) theory that you might get a geometrically growing system load, rather than just keeping two makes running through all the subdirectories. This is the behavior of "-j", unless you specify it without a numeric parameter, in which case it *does* allow parallel submakes. The first time I tried "-j", I did it without reading the man pages and without specifying a numeric parameter. It did a magnificent job of bringing down my system trying to build ACE/TAO, a *large* Corba package. Chewed up all of real memory, then all of swap; not sure if I ran out of process slots or memory first but it wasn't pretty. It was *very* fast though :) - Thomas -- Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu South Pasadena, California
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: