Re: [HACKERS] couldn't rollback cache ?
От | Vadim Mikheev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] couldn't rollback cache ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 37E5992E.FDEE6427@krs.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] couldn't rollback cache ? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > > "Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp> writes: > > But as far as I see,neither relation cache nor system catalog cache > > aren't be rollbacked correctly. > > I added time_qualification_check to SearchSysCache() on trial > > (see the patch at the end of this posting). > > Hmm. This must be a bug of very long standing; surprising it hasn't > been noticed before. I think you are probably right, because a little > glimpsing shows that SearchSysCache() is the *only* place in the whole > system where HeapKeyTest() is called directly --- everyone else goes > through HeapTupleSatisfies() which adds a timequal check of one sort or > another. I don't know the timequal stuff at all, but it seems likely > that we want one here. (Vadim, is this fix right?) Sorry, but currently I have no ability to deal with anything but WAL. As for cache/SI issues, I would like to see shared catalog cache implemented (and remove current SI stuff), but I was not able to do it for ~ 2 years, -:( Vadim
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: