Re: [HACKERS] main tree is (slightly) damaged
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] main tree is (slightly) damaged |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 37D5D196.1DA47710@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] main tree is (slightly) damaged (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] main tree is (slightly) damaged
Re: [HACKERS] main tree is (slightly) damaged |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > I've got trouble in a *clean* checkout of this morning's current tree. > > Something in the system tables is not quite consistant: > > postgres=> \d > > ERROR: nodeRead: Bad type 0 > Yipes. Perhaps there is some platform-dependency in the md.c changes > I committed a couple days ago. I am not seeing any such problems, > but that doesn't prove a lot. How far back was the last version > that worked on your system? > > Do any other platforms run the tests without trouble? > HPUX 9 here. This is a big-endian box; maybe a byte ordering issue? postgres=> select * from pg_tables; ERROR: nodeRead: Bad type 0 I still see a problem. Did a "make clean install; initdb", as well as a clean checkout of the current source tree from cvsup. Is anyone else running regression tests besides the Toms? Can someone report success on a linux box? Don't know where the problems are coming from... I'm sure I ran the regression tests around the v6.5.1 release date, but haven't been doing code development since then (working on docs instead) so haven't been testing... - Thomas -- Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu South Pasadena, California
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: