Re: [HACKERS] Why not sub-selects in targetlists?
От | Vadim Mikheev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Why not sub-selects in targetlists? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 37C9E0E6.AFD53DBE@krs.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Why not sub-selects in targetlists? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Why not sub-selects in targetlists?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > > For some reason we currently support sub-SELECT expressions only > in WHERE and HAVING clauses, not in the target list of a SELECT. > Does anyone know why this is? > > There are a number of places in the planner/optimizer that would need > to be fixed to make it happen, but the changes are utterly trivial > (calling certain transformation routines on the targetlist as well as > for WHERE and HAVING ... probably about a dozen lines total ...). > And a quick look at the executor doesn't show any reason why it would > have a problem, either. Is there something fundamental that I'm > missing? If not, why wasn't this done to begin with? As usual, I just hadn't time to do more than it's done for 6.3.X -:) Subselects were not in my TODO list, I made base implementation because of there were many requests for them. BTW, please don't forget subselects in FROM. Vadim
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: