Re: Reliable WAL file shipping over unreliable network
От | Rui DeSousa |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Reliable WAL file shipping over unreliable network |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 37C5A42B-4CDD-4F01-8F1E-1B185C1819B9@icloud.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Reliable WAL file shipping over unreliable network (scott ribe <scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Reliable WAL file shipping over unreliable network
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
Sure it does… what happens if the archive server gets full? There is a situation that can fool rsync into thinking it wassuccessfully transferred as rsync only relies on filesystem metadata to verify the file is different. The “-c” optionwill validate the file using a checksum and not just rely on just filesystem metadata. Trust me on this one; I’ve seen this happen. > On Feb 28, 2018, at 1:05 PM, scott ribe <scott_ribe@elevated-dev.com> wrote: > > On Feb 28, 2018, at 10:05 AM, Rui DeSousa <rui.desousa@icloud.com> wrote: >> >> Just use "-ac”; you want -c option to ensure no data corruption during the transfer. Do not delete the file; let Postgresmanage that. > > -c has nothing to do with data corruption during transfer > > -- > Scott Ribe > https://www.linkedin.com/in/scottribe/ > (303) 722-0567 >
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: