Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 37AF9AA2.367659E7@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Oh, I get it. Can everyone handle multi-character man sections? That is how, for example, the X system does their man pages. There are sections "1x", etc. Except that now that I look on my RH linux system they are squirreled away in /usr/X11/man/man1/, etc so I must have seen that on another system. Perhaps my old Alpha boxes?? > I would like to use existing sections, rather than do our own. I found > I had to modify the man page search to look in a manl, and others may > have the same problem. Yes, that is a consideration. It is easy to automate adding a new section (like "1sql" or "1p" or ??) for packages, but is something the admin needs to remember to do on a from-source installation. otoh, it does eliminate the possibility of man page pollution if we manage to have the same man page name as some other existing page. *That* would be a bad thing. And in general adding ~75 man pages to existing sections is a pretty big load... - Thomas -- Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu South Pasadena, California
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: