Re: Pronunciation of "PostgreSQL" (was: Re: [HACKERS] New man pages)
От | lamar.owen@wgcr.org |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Pronunciation of "PostgreSQL" (was: Re: [HACKERS] New man pages) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 37AF9A53.8CC2CE6E@wgcr.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Pronunciation of "PostgreSQL" (was: Re: [HACKERS] New man pages) (Peter Eisentraut <peter@pathwaynet.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart wrote: > > I'll bet that even the coiners of the term have some differences in > their pronunciation. For the record, I use "Postgres" usually, and > "Postgres-cue-ell" when forced... > Since we cap the "S", however you pronounce "SQL" should probably be > how you do the end of "PostgreSQL". Lamar, are you a "ess-quel" > person? That may be a regional dialect. Only in postgressive context (ouch...) I have been known to say 'squel' (as opposed to ess-quel....). If I could just inflect my Southern Drawl in text.... And I have said ess cue ell (not very often...)... Oh well. Minor points. I think it goes back to my Z80 days, where I'd pronounce the machine code -- it sounds real strange to say "sidbateotwo" to mean CD B8 02 (CALL x'02B8' in Z80 assembler), but I have actually done that. Just a little game that a friend and I would play. Incidentally, radically changing the subject, I have done some tests on the RPM-packaged perl client, with great success. I am also experimenting with my new (3lo) RPM's, which are the first try to package the regression tests. Now to see if they run ;-/ As soon as the RedHat 5.2 machine (a creaky 486-100 w/16MB) finishes a good build, I'll post. Although, I am hitting snags -- the regression tests have some strange requirements -- ie, the resulting regress.so in the package is built to require /usr/local/bin/perl, and /usr/local/bin/python..... Oh well; I'll slog through it. Now to learn enough python to be dangerous... Lamar
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: