Re: [HACKERS] New man pages
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] New man pages |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 37AEE198.FB80A1B0@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | New man pages (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] New man pages
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> There's only a little thing that I would like to recall your attention; > I see whenever the name Postgres instead of > PostgreSQL. Is there a reason to continue to call it Postgres in the > docs ? I have chosen to use "Postgres" within the docs, as a shorter (and pronouncable ;) form of our product. "PostgreSQL" appears in all titles and introductory material. I have considered the "SQL" part of the "PostgreSQL" as sort of a version or branch, like "OpenIngres" or "Windows 2000", and a bit cumbersome in the body of the docs. But that was a choice which can always be reconsidered, we're just a "sed" away from a different name... - Thomas -- Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu South Pasadena, California
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: