Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha & postgresql
От | Uncle George |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha & postgresql |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 379CC5D9.E072E818@voicenet.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PORTS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha & postgresql
|
Список | pgsql-ports |
On the July 26 snapshot, I have not seen the changes to the postgresql/alpha port. Although u can reiterate as much as u want, I percieve no particular direction by u folks to get the alpha port done 100%. I haven't even been asked any questions about the alpha patches. Over the weekend I have resolved the problems with rules.sql, and despite your assurances, I have resolved it to a postgresql peculiarity dealing with Cost. Anyway, I have to move on, and just cant wait. Lemme know when u have applied/ resolved what to do with the patches. gat Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Let me reiterate Thomas's comments on this. Alpha has been a very > bad port for us. I realize the problems are complex, but each alpha > person seems to know only 80% of what we need to get things working > 100%. We get partial solutions to small problems, that just seem to > fix things long enough for current release. We had one release that > would not even initdb on alpha. We really need alpha folks to get their > noses to the grindstones and give us some solid causes/fixes to their > problems. >
В списке pgsql-ports по дате отправления: