Re: [HACKERS] SSL patch
От | Hannu Krosing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] SSL patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 379C355B.DA4DDF7F@trust.ee обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: [HACKERS] SSL patch ("Ansley, Michael" <Michael.Ansley@intec.co.za>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Ansley, Michael" wrote: > > Hannu wrote: > >> Actually you are free to use HTTPS on 80 and HTTP on 443 if you wish. > >> > I understand this; the point that I was trying to make was that they run on > different ports. I don't think that it's possible to run both http and > https on the same port at the same time on the same server, and I think that > we should take the cue. It is possible unless you mean that the very same connection is both http and https ;) The decision to use either http or https is done et _each_ connection setup (at each http(s) request). So http://samehost.com:443/ and https://samehost.com/ will connect to samehost.com port 443, only the latter user SSL. > > It's a concept that people already understand. Agreed, but there is nothing at the protocol level that forces them to be separate. ------------- Hannu
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: