Re: [HACKERS] Merging old man pages
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Merging old man pages |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3790ED81.B9F38C0D@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Merging old man pages (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Merging old man pages
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> OK, let me get this straight: man pages will no longer be in the CVS > tree because they will no longer be original files, but they will be > part of the standard distribution as derived files, right? Yes. Well, at least, maybe, sort of... As is the case with the other (html) docs, I'm planning on putting a man tarball into the distribution. Up to now, the easiest way to do that is to put the tarball into cvs, but I'm open to other suggestions. Do I guess correctly that we currently generate our production releases by actually doing a cvs checkout and then a "mini-build" of the system to generate the yacc/bison derived files? If so, we could consider doing the same sort of thing for the html and man products, but it (probably) makes this packaging process more fragile. - Thomas -- Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu South Pasadena, California
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: