Re: [HACKERS] Interesting behaviour !
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Interesting behaviour ! |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 378CC8D3.A9CDD470@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Interesting behaviour ! (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Interesting behaviour !
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> This might be a relatively simple bug to fix after all, > but it needs more time to find exactly where things are going wrong... > and I have to get some Real Work done... Don't let me stop anyone from looking at this, but fyi this is the one area I didn't yet touch for the "transparent type coersion" work I did for v6.4 and which is still ongoing of course. istm that wherever index use is evaluated one could allow pre-evaluated functions on constants, rather than just strict constants as is the case now. There is a precedent for pre-evaluation of elements of the query tree. If function calls are allowed, then we can try coercing constants using these existing coersion functions, at least when the target column is a "superset type" of the constant. You still run into trouble for cases like select intcol from table1 where intcol < 2.5; - Thomas -- Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu South Pasadena, California
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: