Re: [GENERAL] Joins and links
| От | David Warnock |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [GENERAL] Joins and links |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3780E0EA.5AEA9F5B@sundayta.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] Joins and links (David Warnock <david@sundayta.co.uk>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Leon, I agree that the static CLUSTER that Postgresql currently supports will not help you much. When I suggested looking for a CLUSTER type feature I only knew of dynamic clustering that removed the need for an index. The discussion is not going anywhere as static clustering will not help you and dynamic clustering is not about to be added. If you are interested in other solutions that do not involve adding record number support (which I personally still feel to be a mistake in a set orientated dbms) then have you considered an application server linked to triggers. For some applications is is mposible for an application server to maintain the latest reports on-line, recalculating as required by a trigger notifying it of relevant changes. Then reporting comes instantly from the app server. If there are a large number of different reports or the reports have a lot of selections and options this may not be possible (but a half way house might still be by using a slightly flattened table structure for reporting). Regards Dave -- David Warnock Sundayta Ltd
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: