Re: Time zone offset in to_char()
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Time zone offset in to_char() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 37804bda-ebe5-4786-be63-4d2a325368a6@aklaver.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Time zone offset in to_char() (Alban Hertroijs <a.hertroijs@nieuwestroom.nl>) |
Ответы |
Re: Time zone offset in to_char()
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 1/11/24 08:04, Alban Hertroijs wrote: > > In the above, I worked around the issue using a couple of > user-defined functions in PG. That should give a reasonable idea of > the desired functionality, but it's not an ideal solution to my problem: > > 1). The first function has as a drawback that it changes the time > zone for the entire transaction (not sufficiently isolated to my > tastes), while > > 2). The second function has the benefit that it doesn't leak the > time zone change, but has as drawback that the time zone is now > hardcoded into the function definition, while > > 3). Both functions need to be created in the caching database > before we can use them, while we have several environments where > they would apply (DEV, pre-PROD, PROD). > > Would a function that dispatches its calls to a suitable array of > hard-coded functions based on an IN parameter help any ? > > Karsten > > Well, probably, but we don't have many time zones that are relevant to > us. For that, the current functions would be sufficient. > > The drawback, as mentioned, being that we need to maintain those > functions in each deployment, which is a bit of a hassle (albeit a minor > one) because we need to customise both the TDV side and the PostgreSQL > side in that case. Our preferred solution would be to just add a few > entries to the TDV database-specific capabilities file (as described in > my initial message) Are you referring to?: "It currently have this: ToDatetimeOffsetNL(~any) : ciscache.ToDatetimeOffsetNL($1) ToDatetimeOffset(~any,~any) : ciscache.ToDatetimeOffset($1, $2) " I thought the issue there was maintaining the two Postgres functions? > Provided that such a solution is possible, that is. If not, my current > approach may have to suffice. > > The reason I decided to ask on the ML is that I'm finding it hard to > believe that this transformation would be this difficult, so I expect > that I must be missing something. > > Regards, > Alban Hertroys -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: