Re: Log rotation
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Log rotation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3779.1079054626@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Log rotation (Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Log rotation
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com> writes: > Please remind me again why the postmaster cannot close and open the log > file when it receives a SIGHUP (to re-read configuration)? (a) Because it never opened it in the first place --- the log file is whatever was passed as stderr. (b) Because it would not be sufficient to make the postmaster itself close and reopen the file; every child process would have to do so also. Doing this in any sort of synchronized fashion seems impossible. It's much cleaner to have stderr be a pipe to some separate collector program that can handle log rotation (ie, the Apache solution). regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: