Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1 status
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1 status |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 377855FC.1A669355@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1 status (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > > First time for last two years -:)). > > We must be starting to know what we are doing, eh? :) > Interesting outlook. :-) Hmm. It is also the longest beta, longest period between releases, and longest slip in release date. Not that those are bad; we apparently got a solid release out of it. I still can't believe that Vadim pulled off his huge changes! btw, I upgraded a small production server at work which does plain-vanilla SQL stuff and found that the following was *really* all it took to upgrade from v6.4.2: pg_dumpall -z > file.pg_dumpall shutdown server change soft link to new tree build and install s/w initdb start new servercopy pg_hba.conf psql < file.pg_dumpall About 10 minutes total elapsed time. Pretty impressive imho. I will have some patches for v6.5.1 (and v6.6, but they may be superceded during the cycle by Tom Lane's suggestions) to allow the Postgres packaged apps to be built as shared libraries. The patches are almost trivial, though the build sequence to actually get dynamically-linked apps is not. Also, there is a new version of pgaccess which we could incorporate, and the ODBC driver could be refreshed. I could also fix a few typos in the docs... - Thomas -- Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu South Pasadena, California
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: