Re: [HACKERS] fsynch of pg_log write..
От | Vadim Mikheev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] fsynch of pg_log write.. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3772EEC3.4F306F77@krs.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | fsynch of pg_log write.. (Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Don Baccus wrote: > > FlushBufferPool /* flush and fsync the data blocks */ > TransactionIdCommit /* log the fact that the transaction's done */ > FlushBufferPool /* flush and fsync pg_log and whatever else > has changed during this brief period of time */ > > I just added a couple of lines of code that saves > disableFsync and sets it true before the second call > to FlushBufferPool, restoring it to its original state > afterwards. ... > So...does it sound like I'm doing the right thing? It's bad in the case of concurrent writes, because of second FlushBufferPool "flushes whatever else has changed during this brief period of time". Right way is just set some flag in WriteBuffer()/WriteNoReleaseBuffer() and don't do FlushBufferPool TransactionIdCommit FlushBufferPool at all when this flag is not setted. I'll do it for 6.5.1 if no one else... Vadim
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: