Re: [HACKERS] Re: Apparent bug in _make_subplan
От | Vadim Mikheev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Apparent bug in _make_subplan |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3769E70E.7E1616CF@krs.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Apparent bug in _make_subplan (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Apparent bug in _make_subplan
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Apparent bug in _make_subplan |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > subselect.c uses varlevelsup as absolute level number only > > for correlation vars <--> params mapping, so why should it be > > source of bugs? SS_replace_correlation_vars replaces all > > correlation vars with parameters. Vars with absolute varlevelsup > > are in PlannerParamVar only. To identify correlation vars and > > to know is parameter already assigned to a var we obviously > > need in absolute level number. > > But the varlevelsup I pass in from the parser are relative to the > current level, not absolute. subselect.c takes it into account, computes absolute numbers and stores them in PlannerParamVar only... Vadim
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: