Re: a plpgsql bug
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: a plpgsql bug |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 376951.1695139931@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: a plpgsql bug ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 11:46 PM daidewei@highgo.com <daidewei@highgo.com> > wrote: >> I found a problem in plpgsql. When there is a large loop in plpgsql, >> it is found that the change of search_path will cause memory exhaustion and >> thus disconnect the connection. > It is impossible to prevent queries from exhausting memory so the fact that > this one does isn't an indication of a bug on its own. I'm having trouble > imagining a reasonable use case for this pattern of changing search_path > frequently in a loop within a single execution of a function. That said, > I'm not in a position to judge how easy or difficult an improvement in this > area may be. I poked into this a bit with valgrind. It seems that the problem is that the changes to search_path thrash the "simple expression" mechanism in plpgsql, such that it has to re-plan the various expressions in the called function each time through. It's good about tracking the actual cached plans and not leaking those, but what is getting leaked into transaction-lifespan memory is the data structures made by expr->expr_simple_state = ExecInitExprWithParams(expr->expr_simple_expr, econtext->ecxt_param_list_info); We could conceivably reclaim that data if we were willing to set up yet another per-expression memory context to hold it. That seems like rather a high overhead though. The given test case is obviously a bit artificial, but I think it may be a simplification of fairly plausible use-cases. The triggering condition is that the same textual expression in a plpgsql function gets executed repeatedly with different search_path settings, which doesn't seem that unreasonable. Perhaps another approach could be to assume that only a small number of distinct search_path settings will be used in any one transaction, and cache a separate plan and estate for each one. That would have the nice side-effect of avoiding the replanning overhead, but then we'd have to figure out how to manage the cache and keep it from blowing out. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: