Re: OpenSSL Applink
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: OpenSSL Applink |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3763.1190998537@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: OpenSSL Applink (Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: OpenSSL Applink
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Doesn't really matter. Even if we were willing to hack our own client >> apps like that (which I'm not), we can *not* transfer such a requirement >> onto every libpq-using application. It's just not acceptable. > *We're* not transfering any requirement. I've fixed pgAdmin for example > without any need to touch any Postgres code. Well, yeah, we are, as evidenced by the fact that you had to do something to pgAdmin. Every other application that uses libpq would also be facing source code changes to make it work. Is there really no way to solve this within libpq? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: