Re: Windows buildfarm members vs. new async-notify isolation test
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Windows buildfarm members vs. new async-notify isolation test |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3757911.1598757705@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Windows buildfarm members vs. new async-notify isolation test (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes: > I made a thing to watch out for low probability BF failures and it > told me that a similar failure in async-notify might have reappeared > on brolga: > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=brolga&dt=2020-07-15%2008:30:11 > | REL_10_STABLE > [ etc ] Hm, interesting. None of these examples show an actual *failure* to receive a notification, unlike the example that began this thread. So it seems unlikely that back-patching 16114f2ea would help. What we are seeing here, instead, is delayed timing of notify receipt(s). I suspect that this is a variant of the issue described over here: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/2527507.1598237598%40sss.pgh.pa.us I didn't have a great idea about how to fix it reliably in insert-conflict-specconflict, and I lack one here too :-(. It's interesting though that your examples are all in v10 or older. Could we have done something that indirectly fixes the problem since then? Or is that just chance? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: