Re: Remove useless arguments in ReadCheckpointRecord().
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Remove useless arguments in ReadCheckpointRecord(). |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 375560.1658459404@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Remove useless arguments in ReadCheckpointRecord(). (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Remove useless arguments in ReadCheckpointRecord().
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> writes: > On 2022/07/21 14:54, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote: >> At Thu, 21 Jul 2022 11:45:23 +0900, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote in >>> - (errmsg("could not locate required checkpoint record"), >>> + (errmsg("could not locate a valid checkpoint record in backup_label file"), >> "in backup_label" there looks *to me* need some verb.. > Sorry, I failed to understand your point. Could you clarify your point? FWIW, the proposed change looks like perfectly good English to me. "locate" is the verb. It's been way too many years since high school grammar for me to remember the exact term for auxiliary clauses like "in backup_label file", but that doesn't need its own verb. Possibly Kyotaro-san is feeling that it should be like "... checkpoint record in the backup_label file". That'd be more formal, but in the telegraphic style that we prefer for primary error messages, omitting the "the" is fine. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: