Re: Database Corruption - last chance recovery options?
От | Thomas F. O'Connell |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Database Corruption - last chance recovery options? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 374DD2FA-E5FD-4BE8-85A0-6AB1A536E376@o.ptimized.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Database Corruption - last chance recovery options? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Database Corruption - last chance recovery options?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Jan 5, 2007, at 10:01 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Best <mbest@pendragon.org> writes: >> Set your memory requirement too high in postgresql.conf, reload >> instead >> of restarting the database, it silently fails sometime later? > > Yeah, wouldn't surprise me, since the reload is going to ignore any > changes related to resizing shared memory. I think that 8.2 might > warn > you that it was ignoring the un-applyable changes, but the warnings > would only go to the postmaster log, where they're easily missed :-( Wait, now I'm curious. If a change in postgresql.conf that requires a restart doesn't take effect on reload, then how could a related failure manifest at all, regardless of when? -- Thomas F. O'Connell optimizing modern web applications : for search engines, for usability, and for performance : http://o.ptimized.com/ 615-260-0005
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: