Re: [INTERFACES] ODBC - Makefiles
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [INTERFACES] ODBC - Makefiles |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 37398C3C.742A44E3@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | ODBC - Makefiles (Peter Harvey <pharvey@codebydesign.com>) |
Список | pgsql-interfaces |
> I am confused. I have the zip file distribution from Byrons web site. > Its supposed to be the latest and greatest but it has no make files for > UNIX/Linux? Right. Byron develops under WIN32. Several of us helped port it to Unix some time ago. > I also have a set of source which is integrated into the server > distribution. It appears to have UNIX/Linux make files but I could spend > way too much time getting my head into it then I want to. I have many > other drivers to work on and I can not spend time figuring out every > source/config structure of the servers etc. ?? There is one directory which contains an older version of Byron's code. He is planning on updating our CVS repository, though it looks like he hasn't had a chance to do that yet. The Right Way (tm) to build a standalone version of the driver on Unix is to build a standalone tar file from a configured Postgres tree: cd src ./configure --with-odbc cd interfaces/odbc make standalone Take the resulting tar file and put it into a separate area, then make from there. > My preferred option is to work with the zipped/standalone version and > then hand the whole thing back to Byron... things brings me back to > 'where are the UNIX/Linux make files'? I'd suggest starting from an updated standalone tar distribution as described above. I'll build something and send it to you when Byron has a chance to do the updates (and I can test them), or you can take the existing standalone distribution on ftp.postgresql.org and merge Byron's code in yourself. He had suggested waiting for his changes however. btw, since the newest code is *not* in the cvs repository, folks doing development under Unix can not test or keep up to date with changes. So we should probably consider the current cvs tree as the best available distribution, even though it is out of sync with zipballs posted at insightdist.com. Is there anyone out there who is actively developing ODBC under Unix and perhaps WIN32 who would want to help us keep up to date with changes for the Unix side of things? It's usually not much work, but it could use someone with that focus... - Tom -- Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu South Pasadena, California
В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления: