Re: [HACKERS] Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc
От | Brian P Millett |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 373870DE.7A63FC06@ec-group.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > > This is all clearly part of the large object mess that we were in before > > you fixed large objects. > > > > Do whatever you think is best for the long term. Large objects were so > > terribly fragile in previous releases, we might as well advertise them > > again as now working 100% of the time. If the new behaviour changes > > existing apps, that is OK if the new behaviour is superior. They will > > be thrilled to change their apps if the large object system now works > > better. > > > > It would be different if the old system worked properly. > > I have changed lo_read/lo_write so that they run under same memory > context as other LO calls. Well, for the first time (for me) the blobtest.java now works correctly. That would be Solaris 2.7, cvs checkout 19990511, jdk1.2.1_02. Thank you all for the great work. -- Brian Millett Enterprise Consulting Group "Heaven can not exist, (314) 205-9030 If the family is not eternal" bpm@ec-group.com F. Ballard Washburn
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: