Re: [HACKERS] numeric & decimal
От | Thomas Lockhart |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] numeric & decimal |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 37371E46.13434AA0@alumni.caltech.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] numeric & decimal (jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] numeric & decimal
Re: [HACKERS] numeric & decimal |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > > NUMERIC without size is interpreted as NUMERIC(x,6). Why ? > > > Standard SQL92 says that NUMERIC without size is equivalent > > > to NUMERIC(1) > PostgreSQL specific. Should I change it to standard? The standard (per Date's book) is: NUMERIC == NUMERIC(p), where p is implementation-defined. NUMERIC(p) == NUMERIC(p,0) Date also explicitly says that: "The following are implementation-defined: ... o The default precision for NUMERIC and DECIMAL if there is no declaredprecision ..." So where did NUMERIC(1) come from? afaict Jan should use what he feels are reasonable values... - Tom -- Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu South Pasadena, California
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: