Re: 64-bit size pgbench
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 64-bit size pgbench |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3717.1264781397@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | 64-bit size pgbench (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: 64-bit size pgbench
Re: 64-bit size pgbench |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Was looking for general feedback on whether the way I've converted this > to use 64 bit integers for the account numbers seems appropriate, and to > see if there's any objection to fixing this in general given the > potential downsides. In the past we've rejected proposed patches for pgbench on the grounds that they would make results non-comparable to previous results. So the key question here is how much this affects the speed. Please be sure to test that on a 32-bit machine, not a 64-bit one. > ! retval = (int64) strtol(res, &endptr, 19); That bit is merely wishful thinking :-( regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: