Re: [HACKERS] intermittent failures in Cygwin from select_paralleltests
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] intermittent failures in Cygwin from select_paralleltests |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3704785d-2c48-2606-fc8a-aeeb212f102d@2ndQuadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] intermittent failures in Cygwin from select_parallel tests (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] intermittent failures in Cygwin from select_parallel tests
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/21/2017 06:44 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Today, lorikeet failed with a new variant on the bgworker start crash: > > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=lorikeet&dt=2017-06-21%2020%3A29%3A10 > > This one is even more exciting than the last one, because it sure looks > like the crashing bgworker took the postmaster down with it. That is > Not Supposed To Happen. > > Wondering if we broke something here recently, I tried to reproduce it > on a Linux machine by adding a randomized Assert failure in > shm_mq_set_sender. I don't see any such problem, even with EXEC_BACKEND; > we recover from the crash as-expected. > > So I'm starting to get a distinct feeling that there's something wrong > with the cygwin port. But I dunno what. > > :-( Please let me know if there are tests I can run. I missed your earlier request in this thread, sorry about that. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: