Re: [HACKERS] Some 6.5 regression tests are failing
От | Clark Evans |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Some 6.5 regression tests are failing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 37005B60.A99BDC@manhattanproject.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Some 6.5 regression tests are failing (Michael Davis <michael.davis@prevuenet.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Some 6.5 regression tests are failing
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> int2 .. failed > int4 .. failed Both int2 and int4 have been consistently failing for me, but it is due to a wording problem: pg_atoi: error reading "100000": Math result not representable instead of pg_atoi: error reading "100000": Numericalresult out of range Also, float8 usually fails for me, due to the expected being a 'result is out of range' error, and the result being: > ! bad|?column? > ! ---+-------- > ! |0 > ! |NaN etc. > geometry .. failed This almost always fails due to a rounding differences. Is there a way to build the rounding into the test so that it would fail if something is _really_ wrong? > triggers .. failed For me, "check_primary_key: even number of arguments should be specified" is shown as an error, which is not 'expected', then, as a result, everything else in the test fails. This is definately a problem. > misc .. failed > plpgsql .. failed I'm not too sure about these.. I had a host of other failures, but this was due to me running the test in the wrong account.... running it in the right account now. :) > I am running Red Hat 5.1 on intel. Should I be concerned about these? I am > eager to get up and running on 6.5 but always seem to run into one obstacle > or another. I have the same configuration, Pentium Pro, RH 5.1 almost stock configuration. Clark
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: