Re: Optimization rules for semi and anti joins
От | Jonah H. Harris |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Optimization rules for semi and anti joins |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 36e682920902101712w3bc22c18t703f5b2d84e21f94@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Optimization rules for semi and anti joins ("Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Optimization rules for semi and anti joins
Re: Optimization rules for semi and anti joins |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:09 PM, Jonah H. Harris <jonah.harris@gmail.com> wrote:
Cripes! I just had an idea and it looks like the buggers beat me to it :(
http://www.google.com/patents?id=4bqBAAAAEBAJ&dq=null+aware+anti-join
FWIW, the logic looks correct to me.On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:I wrote (in response to Kevin Grittner's recent issues):
> Reflecting on this further, I suspect there are also some bugs in the
> planner's rules about when semi/antijoins can commute with other joins;
After doing some math I've concluded this is in fact the case. Anyone
want to check my work?
Cripes! I just had an idea and it looks like the buggers beat me to it :(
http://www.google.com/patents?id=4bqBAAAAEBAJ&dq=null+aware+anti-join
--
Jonah H. Harris, Senior DBA
myYearbook.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: