Re: SQL/MED compatible connection manager
От | Jonah H. Harris |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SQL/MED compatible connection manager |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 36e682920812151230u1f4ca189r1681c29dec2d2e69@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SQL/MED compatible connection manager (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: SQL/MED compatible connection manager
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 7:55 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > Now I have a question about the FDW C interface. The way I understand it, > an SQL/MED-enabled server and a FDW each have a specific API by which they > communicate. Supposedly, each database vendor should be able to ship a > binary library for its FDW and each SQL/MED-enabled server should be able to > load and use it. (If you don't believe in binary compatibility, then I > think there should at least be source-level interface compatibility.) Yes, all FDWs should be similar to ODBC drivers in that they are self-contained and interface with the database through a defined API. What happens inside them should be irrelevant to PG. -- Jonah H. Harris, Senior DBA myYearbook.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: