Re: Block-level CRC checks
От | Jonah H. Harris |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Block-level CRC checks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 36e682920810300831w4e238d93kd88a3fbab8efa9db@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Block-level CRC checks (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > "Jonah H. Harris" <jonah.harris@gmail.com> writes: >> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Well, yeah, but it has to be able to tell which version it's dealing >>> with. I quite agree with Zdenek that keeping the version indicator >>> in a fixed location is appropriate. > >> Most of the other databases I've worked, which don't have different >> types of pages, put the page version as the first element of the page. >> That would let us put the crc right after it. Thoughts? > > "Fixed location" does not mean "let's move it". Just trying to be helpful. Just thought I might give some insight as to what others, who had implemented in-place upgrade functionality years before Postgres' existence, had done. -- Jonah H. Harris, Senior DBA myYearbook.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: