Re: Automatic Client Failover

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jonah H. Harris
Тема Re: Automatic Client Failover
Дата
Msg-id 36e682920808041442u199582fxda85ed0d92110672@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Automatic Client Failover  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Ответы Re: Automatic Client Failover  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> Well, it's less simple, but you can already do this with pgPool on the
> client machine.

Yeah, but if you have tens or hundreds of clients, you wouldn't want
to be installing/managing a pgpool on each.  Similarly, I think an
application should have the option of being notified of a connection
change; I know that wasn't in Simon's proposal, but I've found it
necessary in several applications which rely on things such as
temporary tables.  You don't want the app just blowing up because a
table doesn't exist; you want to be able to handle it gracefully.

-- 
Jonah H. Harris, Senior DBA
myYearbook.com


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Automatic Client Failover
Следующее
От: "Kevin Grittner"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: IN vs EXISTS equivalence