Re: PostgreSQL derivatives
От | Jonah H. Harris |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL derivatives |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 36e682920806081713w6aa63d00la42846f464ed0aaf@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL derivatives (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL derivatives
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > I wouldn't classify GridSQL as MPP. It's strictly PP. Hmm, how did you come to that conclusion? From every definition of MPP I can find, GridSQL meets the requirements. GridSQL: - Acts as a single, large-scale system by means of shared-nothing clustering (as does Greenplum IIRC) - Partitions and executes independent units-of-work in parallel across multiple independent microprocessors - Is capable of scaling to hundreds (if not thousands) of nodes What definition are you using, because I can't seem to find it in my top 5? -- Jonah H. Harris, Sr. Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324 EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301 499 Thornall Street, 2nd Floor | jonah.harris@enterprisedb.com Edison, NJ 08837 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: