Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease
От | Jonah H. Harris |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 36e682920707131320p3935f1a8w6becbf7c77004864@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On 7/13/07, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > That kind of makes my point :) What point? That using Oracle-proprietary syntax isn't compatible with PostgreSQL? I don't know anyone who would think that it would be. In fact, we have several customers who run EnterpriseDB, but choose not to utilize the Oracle compatibility features. Which gives them the option of going to PostgreSQL should they ever want to. The fact is, if you write a PostgreSQL-only app, it will run perfectly on PostgreSQL or EnterpriseDB. Like Dave and I said, it's EnterpriseDB's policy to ensure that PostgreSQL compatibility is fully maintained. -- Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324 EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301 33 Wood Ave S, 3rd Floor | jharris@enterprisedb.com Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: