Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
От | Jonah H. Harris |
---|---|
Тема | Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 36e682920606221042v2a321189p9ffc79abea14c77a@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC (Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 6/22/06, Rod Taylor <pg@rbt.ca> wrote: > If you INSERT into multiple partitions (by time -- say one per minute) > and TRUNCATE periodically (30 minute old partitions for 30 minute > expiry) it works much better. Expiring the session is quite fast as well > since they'll go away with the truncate. Forgive me if this sounds rude because I'm not meaning it as such, but this suggestion sounds like a MySQL-ish hack. No doubt it would work, but should an application-writer have to incur the cost of writing something different because the database can't handle it? I remember having to write subselect code in PHP because MySQL couldn't do it... not what I would call a *solution* by any mean. -- Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1300 EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301 33 Wood Ave S, 2nd Floor | jharris@enterprisedb.com Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: