Re: Lack of T_TargetEntry in exprType function
От | Konstantin Knizhnik |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Lack of T_TargetEntry in exprType function |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 36db3d92-08e4-e18a-d185-5cce9795887b@postgrespro.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Lack of T_TargetEntry in exprType function (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Lack of T_TargetEntry in exprType function
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 20.03.2018 17:00, Tom Lane wrote: > Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru> writes: >> Is there any reason for not handling T_TargetEntry node kind in >> exprType() function in nodeFuncs.c? > It's intentional because that's not considered an executable > expression. I tried to apply this function to the argument of Aggref and it has exactly this kind. Aggref is executable expression. This is why I thought that all its arguments also should be considered as executable expressions, shouldn't they? My idea was to capture argument of one aggregate and use it in another aggregate during query transformation. Certainly it is not a problem for me to handle this case myself, but I just wonder will it be more natural to extend exprType to handle this node kind as well. > >> But why in this case it is handled in the exprLocation function? > There are lots of things that have syntactic locations but aren't > value-yielding expressions. > > regards, tom lane -- Konstantin Knizhnik Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: