Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY]
От | Amit Langote |
---|---|
Тема | Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 36d781d7-e0f3-e2e9-b4b4-70e0b481a1ed@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY] (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY]
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Alvaro, On 2019/02/12 12:18, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > I ended up defining phases for the index_build phase in the AM itself; > the code reports a phase number using the regular API, and then the > pgstat_progress view obtains the name of each phase using a support > method. diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/indexam.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/indexam.sgml index 05102724ead..189179a5667 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/indexam.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/indexam.sgml @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ typedef struct IndexAmRoutine amcostestimate_function amcostestimate; amoptions_function amoptions; amproperty_function amproperty; /* can be NULL */ + amphasename_function amphasename; /* can be NULL */ Doesn't the name amphasename sound a bit too generic, given that it can only describe the phases of ambuild? Maybe ambuildphase? Thanks, Amit
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: