Re: Global snapshots
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Global snapshots |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 36d657e4-74aa-4f9c-3d6e-30c8a4a5a55f@oss.nttdata.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: Global snapshots ("tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com" <tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
RE: Global snapshots
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2021/01/01 12:14, tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com wrote: > Hello, > > > Fujii-san and I discussed how to move the scale-out development forward. We are both worried that Clock-SI is (highly?)likely to infringe the said Microsoft's patent. So we agreed we are going to investigate the Clock-SI and the patent,and if we have to conclude that we cannot embrace Clock-SI, we will explore other possibilities. Yes. > > IMO, it seems that Clock-SI overlaps with the patent and we can't use it. First, looking back how to interpret the patentdocument, patent "claims" are what we should pay our greatest attention. According to the following citation fromthe IP guide by Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC) [1], software infringes a patent if it implements everything of anyclaim, not all claims. > > > -------------------------------------------------- > 4.2 Patent Infringement > To prove that you5 infringe a patent, the patent holder must show that you make, use, offer to sell, or sell the inventionas it is defined in at least one claim of the patent. > > For software to infringe a patent, the software essentially must implement everything recited in one of the patent�fs claims.It is crucial to recognize that infringement is based directly on the claims of the patent, and not on what is statedor described in other parts of the patent document. > -------------------------------------------------- > > > And, Clock-SI implements at least claims 11 and 20 cited below. It doesn't matter whether Clock-SI uses a physical clockor logical one. Thanks for sharing the result of your investigation! Regarding at least claim 11, I reached the same conclusion. As far as I understand correctly, Clock-SI actually does the method described at the claim 11 when determing the commit time and doing the commit on each node. I don't intend to offend Clock-SI and any activities based on that. OTOH, I'm now wondering if it's worth considering another approach for global transaction support, while I'm still interested in Clock-SI technically. Regards, -- Fujii Masao Advanced Computing Technology Center Research and Development Headquarters NTT DATA CORPORATION
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: